Thursday, 7 June 2012

FINAL REPORT

Media Industries 1 has allowed me to develop my skills as a collaborator and practitioner within the media landscape. The group I was a part of worked well as a cohesive unit, discovering the value of continuous question-asking and re-framing.


Role --

My role within the group shifted throughout the semester. When our groups were first assigned, I was integral in the formulation of  our research question as I had recently completed a 6 month internship at VICE Magazine. Due to my existing knowledge of that media conglomerate, Daniel, John, Jesse, and I came to think about free media and how it is a viable product. At this point, as we were fleshing out the questions we had and exploring what we already knew of the topic area, all of our roles were equal. There was a steady flow of thoughts and ideas between all four of us. As the next few weeks progressed, it became clear that Daniel was leading the charge. My role at this point shifted from being the a key instigator of our research question to a collaborator with the other members of the group. After some discussion, we settled on the idea that we would create and produce a documentary as our ‘answer’ to the research question. Within the documentary framework, my role was to be the producer. I was to handle logistics, gaining interviews with key media practitioners, handling release forms, and generally assisting the direction of the film.  Within this role, I believe I fulfilled most of my duties. Finding interviews was not straight forward or easy, and mostly relied on the personal connections of members of the group. After coming to the realisation that we weren’t going to have time to produce the sort of documentary we would be happy with, we decided to do a few video interviews that would complement our written work. My connections at VICE Magazine allowed me to contact a former co-worker for an interview. For the purpose of our final research report, I had two 2000 word case studies on VICE Magazine and Broadsheet Media, examining their viability in the online world, their strategies, marketing tools, revenue streams, and overall success as media companies.

Progress –

Researching my two case studies of Broadsheet and VICE was a polarising task. I found that on the one hand, I had access to huge amounts of online commentary on both the publications, particularly VIVE, but there was virtually no academic writing on either VICE or Broadsheet. I also discovered that VICE was much easier to research due to the fact that it has been around for much longer than Broadsheet, and because it is a much larger, international publication. Broadsheet is small, localised to Melbourne and Sydney, and barely three years old. Therefore the challenge of finding statistics, commentary, and vital information on the publication itself was much more difficult. I found that I progressed throughout the semester from merely typing the publication into Google and hoping for interesting results, as towards the conclusion of our research project, I was targeting the publications directly, asking for interviews, media kits, and looking closely at the design agencies and advertising agencies that work directly with the two companies. This is where most of the hard data was found, as well as where the movement and changes in the companies could be found. I let myself down in terms of academic research. It was virtually impossible to find academic work done on either VICE or Broadsheet, but I probably could have found more commentary from academics on the trends that Broadsheet and VICE are showing.

Strategies –

Because our research topic morphed from being an exploration of heritage media in the online world, to a study of free media, to finally coming to the viability of online media, our strategy as a team shifted quite dramatically, especially as we were hell-bent on making a documentary. My personal strategy for researching VICE and Broadsheet was to source as much online data and material I could find, edit this down, and come to some conclusion about where these two publications could be headed, or indeed, where they are situated in the world of free, online content. This strategy worked quite well for me. I aligned this research with a thorough understanding of both VICE and Broadsheet which allowed me to understand the data and commentary that I found on the two publications with ease. I believe that my choices in researching this particular way were appropriate and worked well for my case studies. As I stated in the previous section, I found that my research technique shifted after discovering my initial attempts were failing. By targeting VICE and Broadsheet more directly, asking for media kits, the back catalogue of issues, looking at the agencies that have helped to shape them, and examining their affiliated companies, my research became much more thorough and comprehensive. What did not work as well was my academic research into the two case studies. While there is not a total lack of academic referencing, the two case studies would have benefited from a more theoretical analysis backed up by academic commentary.


Problems –

Our groups faced several problems throughout our research. Initially, it took us several weeks to come to an agreement on the actual finite nature of our research question. We found it difficult to pinpoint what we were actually asking as our questions were all ambiguous and we felt that the answer to each of them was probably easily found. Once we settled on The Viabilty Of Online Media we agreed that it wasn’t going to be a finite question and answer type of research, rather that such a question or subject matter, due to its very nature, cannot be confined into a series of short essays. We worked through this problem by deciding to create a series of case studies, provide an overview of changing technologies and the Melbourne demographic, as well as provide some basic background and structure for our research. All of this examining lead us to our conclusion: Where could online media be headed? Another problem our group faced was in the few weeks we spent struggling to turn our research into a documentary. We wanted to create an essay style documentary that would be informative yet still engaging. We looked at existing documentaries by directors such as Errol Morris, however we found that we just didn’t have enough time to produce what we wanted/needed to. We worked though this by deciding we would do a series of filmed interviews with media practitioners and supplement these with written work. I feel that this works well as it offers the reader/viewer a range of content that is informative and engaging.




Connections and Intersections—

Media Industries 1 has been valuable because it has not only allowed me to research a field that will most likely become my area of work – online media – but it has also allowed me to hone in on my research ability. As a problem solving task, our group came to compromises or a middle ground on all of our hurdles. We all worked very well together. Of course, this is not always the case, however when a group seems to have symbiosis with each other, it makes the research much easier. As a learner, I have found this course has taught me that providing an answer to a momentous research question is almost impossible, rather, it is possible to provide theories and statistics, allowing varied conclusions to be drawn and presented to the reader in an interesting way. I was fortunate enough to already have connections with VICE which made networking with that media company a lot easier than it might have been. As for Broadsheet, the accessibility of the publication allowed me to feel as though I was able to gain a thorough understanding of the company’s ethos. What our group deduced from our research of the viability of online media is that generating innovative content is key. My two case studies taught me that online content combined with physical environments for consumers to experience a brand is a vital part of both Broadsheet and VICE’s success. It is an interesting marriage of the cyber and the real that combines to allow brands to understand their audience in a way that has not yet been achieved. By knowing their demographic, a brand or media company can then tailor make online content to appeal to the hearts and minds of their audience. I feel that my research into both VICE and Broadsheet will assist me as a media maker/practitioner/researcher, as it has taught me the value of innovation in both content and business strategy, as well as the value of allowing a research question to continue to challenge you long after the final summaries have been presented (as it has for us on Tumblr).


Taking the above points into mind, for this course, I award myself a Distinction.





Wednesday, 6 June 2012

EVOLUTION OF ONLINE MEDIA ARTICLE

IS SOCIAL MEDIA FREE?


Watch The Virtual Revolution: The Cost Of Free Online | Documentary Stream

Watch The Virtual Revolution: The Cost Of Free Online | Documentary Stream
RESEARCH WEBSITE
Article on NYT Paywall


FACEBOOK CONTENT

We've used Facebook to collaborate over the semester. Here is an excerpt from a Facebook post I wrote to help clarify our direction early on.


When you do your progress reports, make sure you address the following:

1. Your exact role in the research group
2.The progress you have made so far
3. What strategies you have utilised so far
4. What problems you have encountered
5 How have you resolved these? (Or intend to resolve them)
6. How you believe your project may connect/intersect with other research projects? (either in the course or elsewhere)

So, we never really defined our individual roles. I think we need to be clear about what our own strengths are and then just roll with that, yeah?

So we can say that we are all taking on the responsibility of researching the topic however maybe for the documentary, we need to define our roles a little better. i.e. producer, director etc etc. What do you think?

We haven't made a huge amount of progress (and by that I mean we've made no progress). The only thing we've sort of done is settled on the idea that we're going to explore our topic through an academic style documentary. Talk about why we decided to do that (i.e. because it's more engrossing and interesting than a 16,000 word essay), what we envision this doco to be (i.e. an engaging presentation of our research into free media and heritage media), and how we plan on doing it (interviewing selected media practitioners and theorists, possibly gaining inside access to a media company in the process of evolving to a changing landscape).

Strategies utilised? Well we've dipped a toe into possible contacts, but we might need to bullshit this bit a little. In terms of research, a lot of it has been web-based findings, documentaries, online articles etc. They're all really relevant and great, but we've not done anything with them yet...?

Problems: Obviously making a documentary is a fairly beefy task. The biggest problem I think is that we don't yet have an example of an academic documentary to help guide ours. We need to make this look like it's as theoretical as 16,000 words on a screen.

Resolution? More research, maybe writing a mini essay and structuring the documentary around that.

How you believe the project connects with other research projects? It connects with other research projects in the course due to its nature of exploring both new and heritage media, evolving landscapes and platforms. The other group in our class that's doing a project on social media and the evolution of the 'news' clearly corresponds to ours because we are both trying to discover ways in which demographics are changing.