Wednesday, 10 October 2012

Seminar Critique #3

It's Alive: "Why Radio Survived The Death Of Traditional Media"

Lots of guests  and even a performance this week!
  • Lauren Brain – newsreader and presenter at Nova FM
  • May Hu – senior producer in the Mandarin language department at SBS radio
  • Jennifer Bowen – freelancer at ABC Radio National
  • Jack Post – Cacklin Jack (via pre-recorded video)
  • Damon Hughes – producer of Triple J Unearthed
  • Live performance by Lurch and Chief (Triple J Unearthed Band)
The diversity in guests was so great, because it ranged from young and accessible (Damon) to more respectable, older figures in radio. A great look into the scope of radio. 
There were times in this seminar when I felt that the audio was a little low - but it was a small hiccup in the overall running of the seminar. They managed to get through all the guests in time but it didn't feel too rushed. It was nice to have so many guests because I didn't tire of any of them. 
Audience participation was encouraged, and Rose did a great job as host. There were a couple of moments when her skills as host were put to the test, but she did a good job of handling the situations. Overall this seminar was handled well, with good guests and a lively discussion. 


Seminar Critique #2

Pick Your Brains: Digging Up The Truth

I love documentaries so this topic was enjoyable for me. The turn out was fantastic - a really energetic atmosphere. Good overall set up and really enjoyed the showreels for each guest - that element was particularly engaging. Also, nice touch with pamphlets on each seat. This helped to compensate for the motionless backdrop. I felt that perhaps a few varying images might have kept me more engaged.

The guests were again really well selected. John Safran was so succinct and realistic and honest, I feel that he really connected with the audience. Nicolas Hanson, Helen Gaynor, and Dennis K. Smith were also really good speakers with interesting stories to tell.
The best part about this seminar was the info gleaned from the guests. It really felt like stories you would never be able to get access to unless you heard it directly from the guests. Definitely not 'google-able'.

Really well done!

Seminar Critique #1

Pick Your Brains: 28 Minutes Later


Overall, this seminar was of a really high standard. Very well produced promo video and general introduction to the seminar, which was focused on the television industry.


Kieran was a very comfortable host, as he is a natural performer. His conversation with the guests was very easy and inquisitive. The three guests, Laurence Leung, Matthew Saville, and Chris Gist, were well chosen. Laurence is such a recognisable character that the seminar immediately held more gravitas and credibility. Saville and Gist were also respectable choices.

The interviewing was done one on one, unlike other seminars which have been more of a panel discussion. This worked well with Kieran's style of interviewing which was personable and relaxed. I felt that the lighting was a little dim, but other than that, the stage set up looked great.

Overall, there was a good variety in the guests stories and opinions. The entire seminar was upbeat and engaging.

MI2 Self-Assessment Reflection

This is my reflective self-assessment of my work in helping to produce the Pick Your Brains Seminar: Dawn of The Digital.

Contribution and Collaboration:

My role for the seminar was to be in charge of inviting the guest speakers, organising cards/gifts for them, and being in constant contact with them - updating them with the theme of the seminar and answering any of their questions. I held this role with Danielle, and we decided to divide the guests between us so that we were in charge of two each.
Due to work commitments, I was unable to attend many of the group meetings on Friday mornings. I tried to compensate for this by updating my progress on our Facebook group page and the BaseCamp project page. I was in communication with Danielle most of the time, however there were a couple of miscommunications that needed to be ironed out over the course of the organisation. Initially, I suggested a few names of people who I thought might suit our seminar, however it became apparent that there were other students with stronger opinions on who would suit. It was then simply my task to invite them, and provide them with enough information to be prepared for the day. I was prompt and diligent with inviting the guests that we wanted to speak, and due to several hopeful guests being unable to attend, it became quite a hard task to follow up suggestions made by potential guests and track down other suitable speakers. During the last few weeks, I felt that the group really solidified and worked well together.

75/100

Proactive Learning:

I didn't do much beyond my assigned role of handling all that was necessary for the guests to arrive and feel ready and comfortable with the seminar situation. I was proactive with checking the Facebook group and BaseCamp regaularly for any updates and to update the group with any news from my end. I suppose I have had a little experience with arranging and organising photoshoots (inviting people, coordinating etc), so it wasn't out of my realm of comfort to invite and arrange the guests for the day. It goes towards improving communication skills.

75/100

Participation:

As I said earlier, there was a really unfortunate time clash for me on Friday's which made attending class really difficult. However, I feel that when I was there, I participated and involved myself in the discussion as best I could. I participated heavily in keeping group members up to date with news on the Facebook and BaseCamp pages, and never withheld any information. Danielle and I took a while to figure out how we would best complete our tasks together, but by the end we had come to a good situation in which we worked well together.

70/100


Connections and Intersections:

The best part about this aspect of MI2 has been that I have come to realise how often it is that industry professionals will respond to you if you simply ask. I was often hesitant to label myself as a student when talking with the professionals in my field of interest because I have had experiences in the past when I have been dismissed because I am still a student. People often associate that word was 'amateur', which I suppose is justified. But what I found when talking to the potential guests was that they were all very interested in helping me, maybe because they appreciate the need for well educated and informed media graduates to enter the work force. I received very little prejudice in response to my emails, mostly potential guests were flattered and interested that I had found them and decided that they were worthy of speaking at the seminar.
I feel that having the connection with Misha from The Conversation and Christopher from The ABC can only be beneficial to my interest in getting involved with journalism and writing. The entire experience of helping to arrange the seminar has sort of helped to crystallise what I have learnt during my years at RMIT. It was a complete experience from beginning to end, putting the collective skills of my group to use in the production of the day as well as post production. The entire experience felt very professional.

78/100

298/400 = 74% Distinction

Wednesday, 3 October 2012

Attachment



My time as editorial assistant at Time Out Magazine and Vice Magazine gave me a sense of what it means to work in professional environment as a media maker. The skills I learnt were highly specific to each organization, however they can easily be put to use in a variety of circumstances and work places. While both magazines appear to be borne from the same ilk of modern, cultural publications, they differ quite dramatically in content and tone, and so my experience differed from one to the other. This report will outline some of the major experiences I encountered at each magazine, what my duties and responsibilities were, and finally, will look at what I have learned from my experiences and how this will help me further my career.  

VICE – September 2011 – January 2012

My role as editorial assistant at Vice Magazine was the more revealing of the two attachments I completed, because it offered me enough insight in order for me to make a decision that writing for such a publication is perhaps not something I want to pursue as a career immediately. While the experience as a whole was not a negative one, I learnt that my style of writing is more suitable to a less subversive publication. I landed this attachment through a mutual friend of the editor Royce Akers. I had long been a fan of the work Vice does, both in print and online, and felt that it might be a good fit for me. I was in the office 2-3 days a week. Even though Vice is a global brand, the Melbourne office was small, with only around 8 staff members in every day. Unlike the ‘internship’ I had expected, there was no fetching coffee or making prints. My role was as important as any other, particularly after the initial 3-month trial period was over. My duties varied from researching and writing articles, maintaining the CMS (the system behind Vice’s website), compiling photo albums for campaigns for clients like Ray Ban and Adidas, editing captions for VBS film clips, copywriting for short blog posts, and finally liaising with client Smirnoff to create the Vice Nightlife Guide to Australia. I headed the Smirnoff campaign, and was responsible for organizing photoshoots, liasing with models and actors, bar owners and restaurateurs. This project was extremely educational as I learnt how to co-ordinate many people at once, and offered me a glimpse into a more managerial role within the media industry.


Naturally, I am not the most outgoing or confident person, so initially I struggled to feel at ease in the offices. I wanted to appear professional but Vice is an interesting mix of professional journalism and subversive attitude, so the office atmosphere is not that of a ‘stiff’ corporate environment but rather of a young, energetic, but somewhat serious organization. I didn’t feel that I was able to express my ideas confidently at first, however by the end of my time there I felt more at home and able to communicate more freely. I believe my initial feeling of being uncomfortable stemmed from the fact that I knew many of the staff through mutual friends, which perhaps hindered my ability to feel at ease blending my personal life with my professional life. What I learnt from this was that I need more conviction in my own ideas in order to leave an impression on those above me.
The pressure to conform to the ‘voice’ of the magazine was something I struggled with the entire length of my attachment. Vice has a very distinct voice, one of satirical humour and irony. What I discovered was that it is very difficult to be genuinely ‘funny’ in print. It’s a unique ability, one that the previous editorial assistant seemed to own. The editor, Royce, was very constructive with his criticism, and I felt that my writing improved dramatically during my time at the magazine. However, I was often made to feel that my writing did not mesh with the tone of the magazine, and my confidence was thus affected.

My skills as a media maker improved greatly during my time at Vice. Not only did my experience there prepare me for a possible career in magazines, but I also learnt how to follow style guides, work with CMS, interact with clients, and co-ordinate photo shoots and interview contacts for articles. My research skills were honed, as often I was looking into subjects that were quite obscure and challenging.
I was able to network with a wide range of professionals worldwide. My articles were not only published in Australian Vice, but American Vice too. My contact list grew immensely, which is likely to be the greatest benefit from my time at the magazine. I made contacts not only within the magazine itself, but also with photographers and PR people throughout Melbourne.


TIME OUT – June 2012-September 2012

Time Out was an altogether different experience from Vice. The whole experience was a much easier, relaxed one. My role there was as a contributor, and at times I was referred to as editorial assistant. The editor, Jenny, was a much more approachable editor than Royce, and she was much more positive about my writing too. I felt that my confidence grew at Time Out, because all my articles were published and I was given important tasks, often interviewing high-profile Melbournians. I was in the office two days a week at first, but this was reduced to one once university classes resumed. My tasks were to conduct interviews, and to write articles for both the website and the print magazine. Unlike Vice, the articles and subjects were always commissioned by the editor, and there was no need to creatively come up with ideas for the magazine. This in turn meant that there was much less strain and stress on me, but also meant that it was not as fulfilling or exciting as Vice. My copywriting skills were put to the test, and just as Vice has a distinct voice, Time Out does too. I found it much easier to write in the tone of Time Out, as it is much more straightforward and there is much less pressure to be ironic or funny. Time Out Melbourne is not a subversive magazine but merely a cultural guide Melbourne aimed at 25-60 year olds.
My confidence in interviewing subjects grew, and I was given a large amount to do during my time there. I was published in both the magazine and the website, and my articles were made to be features at times, which only helped my confidence to grow.
Time Out, as an experience, was virtually an antithesis to my time at Vice. However, what I gained from both publications was a larger contact list, invaluable professional experience, a better understanding of adopting tone and ‘voice’ to suit each publication, and a broader general knowledge of how to write to a brief and a deadline. I used social media at both publications, gained experience using wordpress and CMS, and improved my self-confidence in terms of approaching potential interviewees.


My time at both Time Out and Vice had very different strengths and weaknesses, but after completing internships at both, I am assured that the more internships and work attachments I complete, the better. I feel that I have increased my contact list immensely. My CV is now at a level where I feel confident enough to approach publications of a higher profile for internships, and quite possibly, a job. Before entering these work attachments, my skills were rudimentary, and whilst I had written professionally for a number of years, I had never been involved in an office environment. This was an eye opening experience, as with no screen to hide behind, my communication skills were put to the test. In terms of personal growth, I have learnt how to be more assertive, more confident with my ideas, and generally more outgoing. My professional skills have grown as I have learnt how to apply many of my university-honed skills to a professional environment. This includes social media campaigns, photography, research, ethics, interview skills, factual accuracy, and general writing development. I believe that through my work attachments, my understanding of what I am learning at University has been heightened, as I am now able to relate it to professional experiences. Perhaps the greatest lesson I have been able to extract from my work attachments is knowing that what at first thought might seem impossible to achieve, is not necessarily so. At the beginning of my degree, I would never have thought it possible to land my internships, however now I have learnt that most media companies are quite receptive to students and work attachments, so the important thing to do is to ask and be persistent. 

Thursday, 7 June 2012

FINAL REPORT

Media Industries 1 has allowed me to develop my skills as a collaborator and practitioner within the media landscape. The group I was a part of worked well as a cohesive unit, discovering the value of continuous question-asking and re-framing.


Role --

My role within the group shifted throughout the semester. When our groups were first assigned, I was integral in the formulation of  our research question as I had recently completed a 6 month internship at VICE Magazine. Due to my existing knowledge of that media conglomerate, Daniel, John, Jesse, and I came to think about free media and how it is a viable product. At this point, as we were fleshing out the questions we had and exploring what we already knew of the topic area, all of our roles were equal. There was a steady flow of thoughts and ideas between all four of us. As the next few weeks progressed, it became clear that Daniel was leading the charge. My role at this point shifted from being the a key instigator of our research question to a collaborator with the other members of the group. After some discussion, we settled on the idea that we would create and produce a documentary as our ‘answer’ to the research question. Within the documentary framework, my role was to be the producer. I was to handle logistics, gaining interviews with key media practitioners, handling release forms, and generally assisting the direction of the film.  Within this role, I believe I fulfilled most of my duties. Finding interviews was not straight forward or easy, and mostly relied on the personal connections of members of the group. After coming to the realisation that we weren’t going to have time to produce the sort of documentary we would be happy with, we decided to do a few video interviews that would complement our written work. My connections at VICE Magazine allowed me to contact a former co-worker for an interview. For the purpose of our final research report, I had two 2000 word case studies on VICE Magazine and Broadsheet Media, examining their viability in the online world, their strategies, marketing tools, revenue streams, and overall success as media companies.

Progress –

Researching my two case studies of Broadsheet and VICE was a polarising task. I found that on the one hand, I had access to huge amounts of online commentary on both the publications, particularly VIVE, but there was virtually no academic writing on either VICE or Broadsheet. I also discovered that VICE was much easier to research due to the fact that it has been around for much longer than Broadsheet, and because it is a much larger, international publication. Broadsheet is small, localised to Melbourne and Sydney, and barely three years old. Therefore the challenge of finding statistics, commentary, and vital information on the publication itself was much more difficult. I found that I progressed throughout the semester from merely typing the publication into Google and hoping for interesting results, as towards the conclusion of our research project, I was targeting the publications directly, asking for interviews, media kits, and looking closely at the design agencies and advertising agencies that work directly with the two companies. This is where most of the hard data was found, as well as where the movement and changes in the companies could be found. I let myself down in terms of academic research. It was virtually impossible to find academic work done on either VICE or Broadsheet, but I probably could have found more commentary from academics on the trends that Broadsheet and VICE are showing.

Strategies –

Because our research topic morphed from being an exploration of heritage media in the online world, to a study of free media, to finally coming to the viability of online media, our strategy as a team shifted quite dramatically, especially as we were hell-bent on making a documentary. My personal strategy for researching VICE and Broadsheet was to source as much online data and material I could find, edit this down, and come to some conclusion about where these two publications could be headed, or indeed, where they are situated in the world of free, online content. This strategy worked quite well for me. I aligned this research with a thorough understanding of both VICE and Broadsheet which allowed me to understand the data and commentary that I found on the two publications with ease. I believe that my choices in researching this particular way were appropriate and worked well for my case studies. As I stated in the previous section, I found that my research technique shifted after discovering my initial attempts were failing. By targeting VICE and Broadsheet more directly, asking for media kits, the back catalogue of issues, looking at the agencies that have helped to shape them, and examining their affiliated companies, my research became much more thorough and comprehensive. What did not work as well was my academic research into the two case studies. While there is not a total lack of academic referencing, the two case studies would have benefited from a more theoretical analysis backed up by academic commentary.


Problems –

Our groups faced several problems throughout our research. Initially, it took us several weeks to come to an agreement on the actual finite nature of our research question. We found it difficult to pinpoint what we were actually asking as our questions were all ambiguous and we felt that the answer to each of them was probably easily found. Once we settled on The Viabilty Of Online Media we agreed that it wasn’t going to be a finite question and answer type of research, rather that such a question or subject matter, due to its very nature, cannot be confined into a series of short essays. We worked through this problem by deciding to create a series of case studies, provide an overview of changing technologies and the Melbourne demographic, as well as provide some basic background and structure for our research. All of this examining lead us to our conclusion: Where could online media be headed? Another problem our group faced was in the few weeks we spent struggling to turn our research into a documentary. We wanted to create an essay style documentary that would be informative yet still engaging. We looked at existing documentaries by directors such as Errol Morris, however we found that we just didn’t have enough time to produce what we wanted/needed to. We worked though this by deciding we would do a series of filmed interviews with media practitioners and supplement these with written work. I feel that this works well as it offers the reader/viewer a range of content that is informative and engaging.




Connections and Intersections—

Media Industries 1 has been valuable because it has not only allowed me to research a field that will most likely become my area of work – online media – but it has also allowed me to hone in on my research ability. As a problem solving task, our group came to compromises or a middle ground on all of our hurdles. We all worked very well together. Of course, this is not always the case, however when a group seems to have symbiosis with each other, it makes the research much easier. As a learner, I have found this course has taught me that providing an answer to a momentous research question is almost impossible, rather, it is possible to provide theories and statistics, allowing varied conclusions to be drawn and presented to the reader in an interesting way. I was fortunate enough to already have connections with VICE which made networking with that media company a lot easier than it might have been. As for Broadsheet, the accessibility of the publication allowed me to feel as though I was able to gain a thorough understanding of the company’s ethos. What our group deduced from our research of the viability of online media is that generating innovative content is key. My two case studies taught me that online content combined with physical environments for consumers to experience a brand is a vital part of both Broadsheet and VICE’s success. It is an interesting marriage of the cyber and the real that combines to allow brands to understand their audience in a way that has not yet been achieved. By knowing their demographic, a brand or media company can then tailor make online content to appeal to the hearts and minds of their audience. I feel that my research into both VICE and Broadsheet will assist me as a media maker/practitioner/researcher, as it has taught me the value of innovation in both content and business strategy, as well as the value of allowing a research question to continue to challenge you long after the final summaries have been presented (as it has for us on Tumblr).


Taking the above points into mind, for this course, I award myself a Distinction.